thestorygirl:

nightmaresandsexyghouls:

grim-doll:

ottermatopoeia:

mattniskanenseyebrows:

OCTOBER IS NEXT WEEK

image

OCTOBER IS THIS WEEK
image

OCTOBER IS TOMORROW

image

OCTOBER IS IN A FEW HOURS

image

OCTOBER IS HERE

image

creaseintime:

are you ready to get

creaseintime:

are you ready to get

creaseintime:

SPOOKY

creaseintime:

SPOOKY

flawfilled:

RIP to all those who didn’t make it to 2014. And to those that did; I’m so, so proud of you.

I didn’t even try to scroll past this

shawtyimmaonlytellyouthisonce:

markruffalo:

It has been brought to my attention that “Gay Rights” is limiting the scope of this community. I meant to say LGBTQ+ Rights. Where you see “Gay Rights” in my Marina Silva post please substitute “LGBTQ+ Rights”

Thanks

MR

mark ruffalo is perfect goodbye

catchaglimpseofalleble:

mr-egbutt:

WAKE UP POTTER
WE’RE GOING TO THE ZOO

Oh i get it now.

catchaglimpseofalleble:

mr-egbutt:

WAKE UP POTTER

WE’RE GOING TO THE ZOO

Oh i get it now.

brolinapproved:

catchaglimpseofalleble:

nikkysclit:

Can you not?

AHG, I fucked this up!

omfg I’ve seen the high school musical post about 15 times and I’ve never understood why it had so many notes. Now I finally understand

brolinapproved:

catchaglimpseofalleble:

nikkysclit:

Can you not?

AHG, I fucked this up!

omfg I’ve seen the high school musical post about 15 times and I’ve never understood why it had so many notes. Now I finally understand

happy-little-chill-pill:

strangecousinsusanx:

pale-fire:

Feminist Graffiti from the 1970s [x]

I haven’t seen this in a while. It never gets old.

Lady’s throwing shade at sam pepper since 1970

happy-little-chill-pill:

strangecousinsusanx:

pale-fire:

Feminist Graffiti from the 1970s [x]

I haven’t seen this in a while. It never gets old.

Lady’s throwing shade at sam pepper since 1970

lukehemmign:

whitebeltwriter:

dual-destininies:

derples:

dual-destininies:

tf2-fandomstuck:

tiniestshorts:

Bread knife

The french have grown more powerful. 

Hold it!

Look more closely at these photographs, Your Honor.

Notice anything strange about the bread?

I didn’t either. That’s because…

…no cuts were made there in the first place!

The witness forged the photographs to make it look like they had an actual bread knife, when they actually did not!

How, you ask? Look to the second photo.

While it is quite obvious that the knife is penetrating the top half of the breadstick, I’m not sure about the bottom half.

Looks pretty flat, doesn’t it?

The angle of the photo makes it look like the knife is in the witness’s breadstick, whilst it is actually behind it. In addition, the cut was actually made after the first photograph and before the second. Continue to the third photograph.

It is also taken from a flat angle, as was the second photograph. I’m sure you’re finding something missing in this photograph as well, Your Honor. Where is the index finger’s fingertip?

This illustration explains it all.

While I am… ahem, not the best artist…

(Didn’t I go to art school?)

The index finger is hidden behind the loaf of bread. It is not wrapping around the loaf of bread. This is because…

The witness was making space to put the knife’s handle!

Objection

Are you really that dull, Wright? For a man who majored in art you should be able to recognize a sculpture when you see one.

as we can see from the photos provided, this is quite obviously plastic.

if you look at any photo of real bread it can’t attain that level of shininess, and even if it could.

If you’ll notice in this picture, the bread on the inside is quite shiny, as well.

Tell me, Wright, have you ever seen real bread gleam that much? Don’t answer that, I will.

Even in this high-resolution photograph with bread that thick, it obviously wouldn’t shine on the inside when it isn’t buttered.

And it isn’t too hard to find the item in question with a quick google search.

Oh, and if you will notice, their hand was covering the seam where the bread was taken apart in the first photo with a simple comparison of the pattern on the bread.

It appears your lawyering skills are in much need of some sharpening if you expect to cut me down with that weak objection.

Edgeworth, you’re asking yourself the wrong question. It’s not “is there bread like that…”

You should be asking “can there be bread like that?”

Sweet bread can be infused with sugar or a syrup, making the outsides shinier- and the insides sweeter. Take a look.

Furthermore. there are parts of the witness’s bread knife that don’t just match up with the novelty bread knives you have presented. Take another look.

Let me point out two things about the novelty knives: one, their markings, and two, the placement of the knife itself.

In the novelty knives, the marks are artificial-looking and repeated. That is because they are manufactured. In the witness’s photo, the marks are more natural and realistic- because they are, well, real!

Furthermore, the blades on the novelty knives are in the middle of the handle.

But… look back at the witness’s photo. The knife is to the left? Where is the problem, you ask? Look at this illustration.

Here we have the knife, a piece of bread, and a table. Let’s have a go.

I’m sure you see it now, Your Honor.

The bread knife cannot actually be used to cut bread efficiently! Even if it was tilted, it would be uncomfortable and unbalanced!

The defense has an explanation for this positioning.

The blade is to the left because the witness was holding it behind the piece of bread!

what the actual fuck tumblr

Oh god I need to share this with the world

vladthehappyfangirlingpsycho:

theglass-is-half-full:

a-spork-with-feelings:

kewilom:

image

image

image

No words neeeded

vladthehappyfangirlingpsycho
This is a beautiful thing here have the thing

MY PLANS FOR THE FUTURE

midorieyes:

voyboyfanclub:


voyboyfanclub:

"Creepshot" Photos Are Now Legal in Texas

A Texas state law prohibiting people from taking photographs “with the intent to arouse or gratify the sexual desire of any person” if the person being photographed does not consent is unconstitutional, according to the state’s highest criminal court. Under this decision, so-called “creepshot” photos, where men often take photos of unconsenting women that they encounter on the street, are legal in Texas.

[thinkprogress]
sooo this is disgusting

dont ignore this
this is important and a huge step backwards


They said the anti-“creepshot” law was too broad, going on to claim that “This statute could easily be applied to an entertainment reporter who takes a photograph of an attractive celebrity on a public street.” So they ruled it unconstitutional. But instead of nullifying it, they COULD just make it more specific?????? (Idk, a lot of states seem to have a problem with that.) This law was originally supposed to prevent creepers from taking pictures of underaged girls/boys in public, which you’d think would fall under the law regarding pedophilia to begin with, but just because the subject is an adult doesn’t mean the need for consent flies out the window. Whether it’s a celebrity or not, people shouldn’t take provocative shots without permission - end of story.

midorieyes:

voyboyfanclub:

voyboyfanclub:

"Creepshot" Photos Are Now Legal in Texas

A Texas state law prohibiting people from taking photographs “with the intent to arouse or gratify the sexual desire of any person” if the person being photographed does not consent is unconstitutional, according to the state’s highest criminal court. Under this decision, so-called “creepshot” photos, where men often take photos of unconsenting women that they encounter on the street, are legal in Texas.

[thinkprogress]

sooo this is disgusting

dont ignore this

this is important and a huge step backwards

They said the anti-“creepshot” law was too broad, going on to claim that “This statute could easily be applied to an entertainment reporter who takes a photograph of an attractive celebrity on a public street.” So they ruled it unconstitutional. But instead of nullifying it, they COULD just make it more specific?????? (Idk, a lot of states seem to have a problem with that.) This law was originally supposed to prevent creepers from taking pictures of underaged girls/boys in public, which you’d think would fall under the law regarding pedophilia to begin with, but just because the subject is an adult doesn’t mean the need for consent flies out the window. Whether it’s a celebrity or not, people shouldn’t take provocative shots without permission - end of story.

theponderingponds:

conorayne:

josiephone:

alwaysactually:

lusilly:

some muggleborn like “i want to be an astronaut when i grow up!”

wizard kids like “wtf is an astronaut”

"oh you know…the people who go to the moon"

implying that magical children would know literally nothing outside of the wizarding worldimage



image

and he was supposed to be the expert

redeemed-from-the-earth:

Hello people! It’s nearly that time of the month again…

September’s #SaveInTheFlesh Social Media Sunday is this Sunday!

New to the show? Wondering what on earth we’re going on about? Click here to find out. There’s everything you need to know about what #SaveInTheFlesh Social Media Sundays are about, why the fandom does this each month and how to take part yourself

Sunday 28th September 10pm UK time - hope to see you all there :)